Ask the prompt repeatedly
Each tracked prompt is collected daily across every enabled AI model. One unusual answer never has to stand in for the whole market.
Data Accuracy
One AI response is not a measurement. friction AI samples your prompts repeatedly and attaches confidence to every figure, so you can separate a reliable pattern from normal AI variation.
One answer is not a measurement
Ask the same AI model twice and the answer can change. Reliable reporting starts by measuring the pattern across responses, not by treating the latest answer as truth.
Each tracked prompt is collected daily across every enabled AI model. One unusual answer never has to stand in for the whole market.
friction AI compares responses across the reporting window to see whether the result stays consistent or keeps changing.
Every figure carries a confidence label, so your team can tell an established pattern from an early directional signal.
Confidence behind every figure
The confidence label is not decoration. It tells you whether the current score is supported by enough consistent data to guide a decision.
How many captured responses sit behind the score, not just how recent the last answer is.
How much of the expected data was successfully captured across the selected period.
How much the result varies from one AI response to the next when the same question is asked again.
Whether the pattern continues across the reporting window and from one week to the next.
Read every result correctly
A strong score with low confidence is still an early read. A lower score with high confidence is a dependable problem to solve. friction AI shows both.
Shows what AI is saying about your brand across the selected prompts, models, market, and time window.
Shows how much evidence supports that score and how consistently the result repeats.
Shows how often your brand appears in the answers as Core, Recurring, Occasional, or Absent.
Mention tiers
Alongside visibility, the mention tier turns response frequency into a label your team can understand immediately.
More than 60% of responses
Your brand is a regular part of how AI answers this question.
30% to 60% of responses
Your brand appears often, but is not yet a dependable part of every answer.
More than 0% but less than 30% of responses
Your brand appears sometimes, so the opportunity is visible but still inconsistent.
Not mentioned in responses
AI is filling the answer with other brands instead of yours.
Evidence behind the measurement
Open the prompt details to move from the confidence label back to the actual answers, brands, and sources that produced the result.
Read the responses used to calculate the result and check the interpretation yourself.
See who appeared, who was recommended, and which brands filled the gap when yours did not.
Inspect the sources, searches, and citations surfaced by the platform where that evidence is available.
Review the search terms AI used while researching an answer whenever that evidence is returned.
Flexible tracking and consistent reporting
Your custom prompts can change with current products, campaigns, and customer questions. The Brand Audit remains a separate weekly baseline that prompt edits cannot change.
Flexible
Editable whenever your priorities, products, markets, or buyer questions change.
Stable
Held separately and run weekly for one stable, comparable reporting baseline.
Questions your team can answer
Continue with friction AI
Track the questions buyers ask, keep a consistent reporting baseline, and inspect the evidence behind every movement.
Measure visibility and recommendations across your editable prompt set, with confidence attached to every figure.
Explore featureUse a separate weekly prompt set and method that stay comparable while your working prompt set changes.
Explore featureSee the sources, citations, and search terms that help explain why AI produced each result.
Explore featureFAQ
friction AI separates reliability from validity. Repeated sampling, coverage, variation, and stability show how reliably a result repeats. Answer-level evidence lets you inspect whether the interpretation is valid. Repeatability alone does not prove that a classification is factually correct.
Confidence rises as more expected responses are collected and the pattern stays consistent across the reporting window and from week to week. When the evidence is limited or changing, the figure is labelled as lower confidence instead of being presented as settled fact.
The mention tier translates visibility frequency into a clear label. Core means the brand appears in more than 60% of responses, Recurring means 30% to 60%, Occasional means more than 0% but less than 30%, and Absent means it was not mentioned.
No. It means the result should be treated as directional because the sample is still limited, collection coverage is incomplete, or the answers are changing. The label tells you how cautiously to use the figure.
Yes. Prompt details keep the original AI answers connected to the model, market, competitors, sources, citations, and available search keywords that produced the result.
The Brand Audit runs with a separate weekly prompt set and measurement method that are protected from edits to your custom prompts. Its results can still change as AI answers and platforms change.
Start with your own prompts. Your first analysis begins immediately, with the score, confidence, mention tier, and underlying answers connected.