A clear expected result
State what you are changing, which audience or question set it should affect, and how you expect visibility to move.
AI Prompt Experiments
Compare two prompt groups on one AI platform, repeat the measurement automatically, and see whether an observed visibility difference repeats. Treat the result as evidence of association, not proof of causation.
A fair, repeatable test
A dashboard trend can tell you that visibility moved. An experiment records what you expected, compares two prompt groups on the same AI platform, and repeats the measurement before treating one side as a dependable lead.
State what you are changing, which audience or question set it should affect, and how you expect visibility to move.
Assign at least five tracked or custom prompts to the control and variant groups so both can be measured repeatedly.
Choose the AI platform where the change matters. Each experiment uses one platform so the result stays clear.
Three-step setup
The setup keeps the expected result, prompt groups, AI platform, and final launch review together.
Give the experiment a name, explain what you are changing, and state why it should move visibility.
Choose control and variant prompts from your tracked set, or add a custom prompt with its market context.
Select an available model, review the prompt counts and expected result, then launch or save the experiment as a draft.
One visibility score, three components
The headline lift shows the overall result. The component breakdown shows whether the difference came from appearing more often, appearing more prominently, or gaining ground in the competitive answer.
How consistently the brand surfaces across the responses in each experiment side.
How prominently the brand appears when the selected model includes it in an answer.
How much attention the brand receives compared with other brands in the selected prompt group.
Repeated runs + confidence
Watch both scores develop as new runs arrive and see when the difference becomes consistent enough to trust.
When the evidence is ready
When the difference becomes consistent enough to trust, the experiment shows the leading side and the next choices available to your team.
Use the leading side as evidence for the next implementation or testing cycle, without treating prompt-group differences as proof of causation.
Keep collecting repeated test runs when the result needs more evidence.
Keep the learning without treating either side as a proven winner.
Tracking + experimentation
Your custom prompt set remains the everyday view of current AI visibility. An experiment gives one expected result its own control and variant groups, AI platform, repeated runs, and confidence check.
Ongoing
Monitor the questions that matter to the business and open the original answers behind each result.
Scoped test
Test a clear expected result with control and variant prompt groups on one selected AI platform.
Continue with friction AI
Start with your custom prompt set, use Actions to find an improvement worth making, and keep every experiment connected to the original AI answers.
Build and edit the prompt set that tracks the customer decisions most important to your business.
Explore featureAudit your website, profiles, channels, and third-party coverage to identify a practical improvement.
Explore featureOpen the customer question, original AI answer, platform, competitors, and supporting sources.
Explore featureFAQ
An AI prompt experiment compares control and variant prompt groups on one selected AI platform. friction AI repeats the measurement, shows the visibility difference, and tells you whether that difference is consistent enough to trust.
Each experiment requires at least five control prompts and five variant prompts before it can start. Prompts can come from the tracked workspace or be added as custom prompts with a market.
No. Each experiment runs on one selected AI platform. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity options are available according to the account plan. Use separate experiments when you need to test another platform.
Current experiments track visibility. The results also break that visibility score into Mention Frequency, Mention Quality, and Share of Voice so you can see what created the difference.
After launch, the first run is scheduled within four hours. The experiment then repeats automatically and shows the next scheduled run, progress toward the minimum, and current results.
Each side needs at least five prompts. Scheduled runs compare group-level visibility on one selected AI platform and report each group score, the observed lift, collected runs, and current confidence. Because the groups can contain different prompts, the result shows an association between prompt group and visibility, not proof that a content change alone caused the difference.
When enough scheduled runs have been collected, the analysis records the test type used, control and variant sample sizes and means, variability, effect size, p-value, and the configured significance threshold. Repeated AI responses are measurements within scheduled runs, not independent observations of customer behavior.
No. Your team makes the change in the relevant site or channel. friction AI provides the experiment structure and measures the visibility outcome on the selected AI platform.
Define the hypothesis, launch the prompt experiment, and let repeated runs build the evidence.